IELTS, Writing
IELTS Writing Task 2
You write an essay responding to an opinion, argument or problem. At least 250 words; it counts for more than Task 1.
Format and scoring
| Skill | Writing |
|---|---|
| Time | 40 minutes |
| Word count | 250 to 320 words |
| How it's scored | Assessed on task response, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy. |
| Weight (estimate) | About 67% of your writing score |
How to answer Writing Task 2
- 1Identify the question type: opinion, discussion, problem–solution, two-part.
- 2Plan your position and two main ideas.
- 3Introduction, two body paragraphs, conclusion.
- 4Leave a few minutes to check.
Writing Task 2 template
- 1It is often argued that paraphrase of the statement, and this has become a widely debated issue.
- 2In my view, your position, because reason 1 and reason 2.
- 3The main reason I hold this view is that reason 1.
- 4For example, specific example supporting reason 1, which shows that link back to your position.
- 5A further consideration is that reason 2; in place or situation, example, so consequence.
- 6Admittedly, the strongest opposing argument; however, why it is weaker or limited.
- 7In conclusion, I firmly believe that your position restated in new words, since summary of both reasons.
Common mistakes
- Not answering every part of the question.
- An unclear position in opinion essays.
Sample question
Working from home: advantages vs disadvantages
In many countries, a growing number of employees now work from home for part or all of the week. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Show a model answer (Band 8.5)
Over the last few years, a growing proportion of office employees have begun working from home for at least part of the week. While this shift brings some genuine drawbacks, I believe its benefits, for both workers and society, are more significant. The most obvious advantage is the time and money saved by not commuting. An employee who previously spent ninety minutes a day travelling regains more than seven hours a week, which can be devoted to family, exercise or rest. Fewer journeys also mean less congestion and lower carbon emissions, a benefit shared even by people who never work remotely. In addition, remote work widens access to employment: parents of young children, people with disabilities and those living far from major cities can now compete for jobs that were once out of reach. Admittedly, working from home has its downsides. Junior staff in particular may miss out on the informal learning that happens when they overhear experienced colleagues solving problems, and some employees report feeling isolated or struggling to separate their working day from their private life. City-centre cafés and shops that depended on office workers have also lost trade. However, these problems can largely be managed. Many organisations have adopted hybrid arrangements, in which teams meet in person two or three days a week specifically for training and collaboration, while focused individual work is done at home. Clear agreements on working hours can protect employees' personal time, and city centres can be adapted for residential and leisure use. In conclusion, although remote working poses real challenges for social connection and early-career development, these can be addressed through sensible hybrid models. The savings in time, the environmental gains and the wider access to jobs mean that, on balance, the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages.